Avoiding the propagation of four Ms when interpreting evidences: mistakes, misinterpretation, misrepresentation, and misinformation

Draper-Rodi, Jerry, Vaucher, Paul, Hohenschurz-Schmidt, D, Morin, Chantal and Thomson, Oliver P. (2022) Avoiding the propagation of four Ms when interpreting evidences: mistakes, misinterpretation, misrepresentation, and misinformation. Mains Libre, 3. pp. 166-176.

Preview

Text Draper-Rodi-2022-Mains Libres.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (282kB) | Preview

Abstract

Context: With the emergence of evidence-informed practice, clinicians are committed to interpreting research and deciding whether it is trustworthy and transferable to their clinical practice, which has a complex nature. This issue is further complicated by the increasing exposure to misinformation (deliberate or otherwise) and misrepresentations that are easily propagated, including via social media. Sharpening critical thinking skills when reading scientific literature would facilitate informed decision making. Objective: This article provides recommendations to empower clinicians to appraise research for themselves, detect common errors, and increase researchers’ accountability regarding accurate communication of their findings. Method: Mistakes, misinterpretations, misrepresentations, and misinformation are discussed for the following study designs: case studies, clinical trials, qualitative research, and systematic reviews. A critical reading approach is proposed to avoid bias and form an objective opinion. Conclusion: The guidance and examples in this paper should enable clinicians to optimize the use of their time (and that of their patients) when they encounter potential sources of evidence.

Item Type:	Article
Schools:	UCO School of Osteopathy
Depositing User:	Users 6 not found.
Date Deposited:	29 Sep 2022 09:50
Last Modified:	19 Dec 2024 16:22
URI:	https://hsu.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/175

Actions (login required)

Edit Item