Consumer understanding of terms used in imaging reports requested for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
Farmer, Caitlin, O'Connor, Denise, Lee, Hopin, McCaffrey, Kirsten, Maher, Christopher, Newell, Dave, Cashin, Aiden, Byfield, David, Jarvik, Jeffrey and Buchbinder, Rachelle (2021) Consumer understanding of terms used in imaging reports requested for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open, 11 (e04993). ISSN 2044-6055
|
Text
156 Newell D 2021 BMJO.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (313kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate (1) self-reported societal comprehension of common and usually non-serious terms found in lumbar spine imaging reports and (2) its relationship to perceived seriousness, likely persistence of low back pain (LBP), fear of movement, back beliefs and history and intensity of LBP. Design: Cross-sectional online survey of the general public. Setting: Five English-speaking countries: UK, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Participants: Adults (age >18 years) with or without a history of LBP recruited in April 2019 with quotas for country, age and gender. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Self-reported understanding of 14 terms (annular fissure, disc bulge, disc degeneration, disc extrusion, disc height loss, disc protrusion, disc signal loss, facet joint degeneration, high intensity zone, mild canal stenosis, Modic changes, nerve root contact, spondylolisthesis and spondylosis) commonly found in lumbar spine imaging reports. For each term, we also elicited worry about its seriousness, and whether its presence would indicate pain persistence and prompt fear of movement. Results: From 774 responses, we included 677 (87.5%) with complete and valid responses. 577 (85%) participants had a current or past history of LBP of whom 251 (44%) had received lumbar spine imaging. Self-reported understanding of all terms was poor. At best, 235 (35%) reported understanding the term ‘disc degeneration’, while only 71 (10.5%) reported understanding the term ‘Modic changes’. For all terms, a moderate to large proportion of participants (range 59%–71%), considered they indicated a serious back problem, that pain might persist (range 52%–71%) and they would be fearful of movement (range 42%–57%). Conclusion: Common and usually non-serious terms in lumbar spine imaging reports are poorly understood by the general population and may contribute to the burden of LBP.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Schools: | AECC School of Chiropractic |
| Depositing User: | CoSector Repositories |
| Date Deposited: | 23 Dec 2024 15:39 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Dec 2024 15:39 |
| URI: | https://hsu.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/337 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |